Assessing phytotoxicity of trace element-contaminated soils phytomanaged with gentle remediation options at ten European field trials
Дата
2017-12-01Автор
Quintela-Sabarís, Celestino
Marchand, Lilian
Kidd, Petra S
Friesl-Hanl, Wolfgang
Puschenreiter, Markus
Kumpiene, Jurate
Müller, Ingo
Neu, Silke
Janssen, Jolien
Vangronsveld, Jaco
Dimitriou, Ioannis
Siebielec, Grzegorz
Gałązka, Rafał
Bert, Valérie
Herzig, Rolf
Cundy, Andrew B.
Oustrière, Nadège
Kolbas, Aliaksandr
Galland, William
Mench, Michel
Metadata
Показать полную информациюАннотации
Gentle remediation options (GRO), i.e. in situ stabilization, (aided) phytoextraction and (aided) phytostabilisation, were implemented at ten European sites contaminated with trace elements (TE) from various anthropogenic sources: mining, atmospheric fallout, landfill leachates, wood preservatives, dredged-sediments, and dumped wastes. To assess the performance of the GRO options, topsoil was collected from each field trial, potted, and cultivated with lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) for 48 days. Shoot dry weight (DW) yield, photosynthesis efficiency and major element and TE concentrations in the soil pore water and lettuce shoots were measured.
GRO implementation had a limited effect on TE concentrations in the soil pore water, although use of multivariate Co-inertia Analysis revealed a clear amelioration effect in phytomanaged soils. Phytomanagement increased shoot DW yield at all industrial and mine sites, whereas in agricultural soils improvements were produced in one out of five sites. Photosynthesis efficiency was less sensitive than changes in shoot biomass and did not discriminate changes in soil conditions.
Based on lettuce shoot DW yield, compost amendment followed by phytoextraction yielded better results than phytostabilisation; moreover shoot ionome data proved that, depending on initial soil conditions, recurrent compost application may be required to maintain crop production with common shoot nutrient concentrations.